DTAAT at Mumbai granted an interim order staying the demolition of the remaining compound wall of the secured property, pending the next hearing date, at the request of the appellants.
Directed the second respondent to maintain status quo as regards the compound wall until the hearing on 22.05.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI
Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 289/2023 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 698/2023
Between
M/s Amir Traders & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Authorised Officer,
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Rishabh Shah, along with Mr Harjot Singh, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellants.
Mr Vishal Raman, along with Mr M. Modi, i/b M/s. PSL Advocates & Solicitors, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 15/05/2023:-
When the matter was taken on 10.05.2023 the Ld. Counsel appearing for the 2nd Respondent sought time for filing a reply and time was granted till 22.05.2023.
1
Respondent is directed to maintain status-quo as regards the compound wall as of date till the matter is taken up for hearing on 22.05.2023.
Sd/-
Chairperson
rm-34
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order of injunction should be passed to maintain status quo pending demolition of secured assets by the auction purchaser.
M/s Amir Traders & Ors.
Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
