The Ventura court granted the respondent bank an additional two weeks to file a reply in the appeal, accepting late service of the appeal memorandum and listing the matter for reply and hearing on 27.04.2023. The request for further time was allowed.
Reply to the appeal to be filed within two weeks from the date of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 240/2022 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 12/2021
Between
M/s. Maven Industries Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. UCO Bank …Respondent/s
An Advocate for Appellant is present.
Ms. Sumedha Sawant, i/b Mr. Nainesh Amin, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 03/04/2023:-
The copy of the Appeal Memorandum was served by the Appellant directly to the Respondent Bank situated in Nagpur and the Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that the copy was received by the Ld. Counsel only on 28.03.2023 and therefore, seeks further extension of the time to file a reply.
The reply shall be filed within two weeks from today.
Post on 27.04.2023 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-06
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent bank is entitled to a further extension of time to file a reply in the instant appeal?
M/s. Maven Industries Ltd. & Ors.
UCO Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
