Sangli Dist. Co. Op Bank v. Mahankali Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
T
DEBTS RECOVERY APPEI 111
_ ---- ATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
i
Mlsc Application No. .of 20 (S C o
In I. No.
Appeal No. of 20 /#U; A/o . 336/211
j
... Appellants
(Advocate
J___ )
Versus
j
Makklaalc ^SeJd^L • Respondents
(Advocate _______ t
r' 1 J
Date Office Notes, Appearances '
and R tglstrar’s order I Chairperson's Orders
jj i 1 1
r j/^eA^^As/L i 4)^ rnfs •
J/
G>
J
y
>
S-o g^e)>s.
I
’ . J
^V-*1
■ <5^ fV^A^ '
/
P.T.O.
!
_ ---- ATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Contd Sheet
| Date | Office Notes, Appear and Registrar's order/Chairp |
ances erson’s Orders |
|---|---|---|
| p^<V,c<reC/ | p\8^* Ad^oJ-V- HaH-oungadi F< None Pb'zr Pespomd^n-^- ■ •TTssue- ndWce upOy. -sresp by 06/12.^023. . F'dj ■ _C-o-r _pos (fippea-a-ance ^P |
|
| 06/l'2//20<i3 | 4 /pppe^Trance Adv* Pblr Non. Fb^ Re^por>de^ V Aax/.f^ AppeJlanV ^eeJ< aP-^dck^i B a4- 1005 |
t rr*e ■to O2/O'Z/ZO^ “T/C^^’staqer, Pile |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court