The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed a Miscellaneous Appeal for default due to the appellants' lack of representation and lack of instructions from the respondent.
Misc. Appeal and I.A. No. 173/2022 dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 173/2022 (WoD)
In
Misc. Appeal No. 61/2022 Between
Harsha WD/o Vinod Patel & Ors.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Assets Reconstruction Company India Ltd. & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Ms. Aparna Jagtap, Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated: 26/09/2023:-
No representation for the Appellant.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent also submits that no instructions have been received from the Respondent.
It appears that the Appellants are not keen on prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, I.A. No. 173/2022 together with the Misc. Appeal are dismissed for default.
Misc. Application, if any, is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-5
1
Harsha WD/o Vinod Patel & Ors.
Assets Reconstruction Company India Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
