Hubtown Bus Terminal Vadodara Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
r
I *****
FARAD
D.EBTS RECOVERY APPELLkTElTRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. .of 20 I. No.
In
Appeal No. ■ . of 20
ON /<2_o2^
-|ub4-0 Te'TTrrJ
LA-d O'ZTS' • I
(Advocate Cbe. | P^gril J
J
Versus I
8 ank OP IvnU'Q
SboJrc
Respondents
T ■ (Advocate RaA4>i H Q O^aTrav aorrn'ar-,
r )
I I
i Date Office Notes, Appearances
________ and Registrar^ order / Chairperson's Orders
OS/OS/2o^3 A’dv • SKajan Ao-jTlApP-^l i an-b -
Ptd- f\ju<rhq Po-4 pdsponclenl- PeJspO r^den b~- .
■^vocoJ-e
pbcR/oCdd-e 'Pott
.r' O zv\ A'x/'all' CjP d— Pe.e .
'pe_v<Y\Cj'^/ <3j
* 2. Z0/^ 02-3
i
Pdj . fbTT O
^37)c. )Q<g is4'2rq2~-
.(
31/10/2023 ftdlv. Sbadab tbs- Appyiarrtv
fVdv ■ P^ar>U ftnr Assporde^ •
ry-b '?re'V^rzrn able
TZSSue rMoHce upom kr«seo^cl
0/23CCO<|-
fcjj 22 I |2j 2023 Cl A '
1-0 22/1^12.023/
Ad; f^TT Pos/Appea^ncr
n
pxds/. Scrzrfha ft^PppeAlanlb • .
2'2/ iQ/io23
^e-?rv fee
• r.s+w?r
P.T.O.
Contd Sheet
| - Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar's order/Chairperson's Orders |
|---|---|
| i, ' |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 271090006242023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court