anil sarawgi v. edelweiss assets recovstruction Co. Ltd. and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
■ ..........................
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
MUMBAI!
MIbc Application No. of 20 ^IrNO^
In
.•Appeal No. •' 20.23
-Pwi
... Appellants
(Advocate. -Au<CVJ (Ks^oJQ^ J
f
Versus
...Rospondfinto
(Advocate, --------- —-------------- LJ
I, J r-------- -
-__ /I .
Data Office Notos, Appsarancos
and Roglstrar’s ordor I Chalfporson'o Ordora
05^^23
. Appeal ’ presented. - by Ia^4v-
ov>1(v\Q. ~ i
Advocate for Appellant with DiD. -M of I^S. " on
being aggrlevecbby ifi
e Impugned order / final order
-#■A!
pas^cHm n S.A. Z^ptA. No.?^ of 2^2-^-
by DRJ> u/s f-fWrB Act j9&8 ./ ;I8 of
S.A.R.F.A.e'.S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - 1 Appeal Memo1
i
S.O. for compliance lo 1 O/H t
1
i
^^REGiSTRAR
|O/Oa/2G23 Owe to administrative
j>oard discharged:: j - 11 -------------
i P.T.O.
4*/*
:;,v■ ••••••:' ■■
| Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar's order /Chairperson’s Orders |
|---|---|
| 3 '\IO.3l'2(y23 |
I C • t TTcV _1Z)Q(SIO _/Q.op3< Haikln,' Po«fiPPe»’^1- Wone Po^ ^sponcknF PchoceJ-e ^075- O'x/dJ oP d€ , nJJ ' ^erwvaJo^d'e^^ |
| 31/10/^20^3 ‘22/12/2023 |
_‘X'f C _♦ P?g . pcJv • Sachin h'cJkim'Po'zr CMone ’Pots' PesponctervF . (MvocaJre Fa-y Apr«Jlan*-seeJ< fiza' Removal oP deFecVs . P\e&j Vxj'zt (Oemr-iaNoJ aP cfe-Pcots’ /22) 1-21-2023 . ^oJ of JePec^. /20 2<a as laSVchancA ' 'A Ad^'Sachin KxiKim' (ott ’ None fe?r Pesporxden-V • p^rrp |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 271090010572023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court