Himanshu Saxena v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 361/2023 Date: 08.12.2023
Himanshu Saxena Vs. Punjab National Bank & Anr.
Present : Shri P. K. Bajpai, counsel for the appellant, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjai Singh, counsel for the respondent-bank,
The office report dated 07.12.2023 shows that no affidavit of service has been filed by the appellant to authenticate the service of notice upon the respondent no. 1 and the notice sent to the respondent no. 2 has returned back with endorsement “no such person resides at the given address”,
Let the appellant take fresh steps within a week for service of notice upon the respondent no. 2 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 14.03.2024 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Himanshu Saxena
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090003612023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court