Gaurav Katyal v. Canara Bank and 10 Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 296/2019 Date: 26.04.2023
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on the I.A. No. 276/2023, whereby it has been prayed that the appellant may be permitted to serve the notice upon the respondent no. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 through paper publication. Let the appellant take steps within a week for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 through paper publication.
Accordingly, the application is disposed off.
List this case on 11.07.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for serving notice via paper publication to multiple respondents under an interim application should be allowed.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/ S Dimple Stone Kresar versus Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd. and Ors.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Rohit Singh Raghav (Since Deceased) Represented through LRs
Union Bank of India versus M/S Prayan Ispat and Steels Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.