The appeal was dismissed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, because the appellant failed to deposit the pre-deposit amount mandated by a prior direction, rendering the default a ground for dismissal.
The appeal and any miscellaneous application stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal on Diary No. 439/2023
Between
Euphoria Technologies Pvt Ltd and Ors … Appellant/s V/s.
M/s. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt Ltd. …Respondent/s
Ms. Y.Y. Naik, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Shobha Chavan, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 25/05/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants has not complied with the direction of this Tribunal dated 26.04.2023 to deposit the amount as pre-deposit.
The default entails the dismissal of the Appeal.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Misc. Application, if any, is dismissed as infructuous.
rm-7
Sd/Chairperson
1
Euphoria Technologies Pvt Ltd and Ors
M/s. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
