Dr. Animesh Shrivastava and Ors. v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order requiring the respondent Bank to file a reply within specified time and addressing the appellant's claim regarding deposit of dues. No substantive decision was rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 112/2020 Date: 01.03.2023
Ram Asre Sonkar & Ors. Vs. Canara Bank & Anr.
Present: Shri Rajneesh Kesharwani, counsel for the appellants, Shri Pawan Kumar Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Bablu, Advocate holding brief of Shri Supriy Mishra, counsel for the respondent no. 2-Auction Purchaser,
The office report dated 28.02.2023 shows that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent-Bank inspite of three opportunities being granted. Let the same be filed by the next date. The said report further records that no pre-deposit has been made.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the entire dues have already been deposited.
List this case on 17.05.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram Asre Sonkar & Ors.
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090000662020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court