Dipak Kumar Giri v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar order directing the appellant to remove defects in an appeal filed under SARFAESI Act, 2002, within 15 days on pain of rejection.
What did the court decide?
Directed the applicant to remove defects within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Diary no.383/2020; Dt.31.03.2022
Dipak kumar Giri…...Appellant
Vs.
Canara Bank & anr.….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Dyutimoy Paul.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Dipak kumar Giri against the order dt.27.07.2020 in SA/116/2019 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.12755/- vide T.R. no.114729 dt. 22.10.2020 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Dyutimoy Paul.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation and accompanied with a petition for condonation of delay.
The Application is also accompanied with a petition for waiver of pre-deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dipak kumar Giri
- respondent
Canara Bank & anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090003832020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court