R Dilip Kumar Son of Raman v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a proceeding in the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai. The tribunal fixed a date for filing vakalat and counter arguments and directed the appellant to serve documents on the respondent counsel.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 182/2023
in A.IR:444/2023
R.Dilip Kumar V/S Union Bank Of India
05/07/2023
Appellant counsel present.
Files AOS in the Registry.
Respondent Bank Notice served.
Ld. Counsel Uma Maheshwari for Respondent Bank undertakes to file Vakalath on behalf of S.R. Sundaram .
Appellant counsel directed to serve copy of Documents to Respondent counsel on priority to enable filing counter on priority.
Call on 13/07/2023 for Vakalath and counter.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Dilip Kumar
- respondent
Union Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090004442023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court