R Dilip Kumar Son of Raman v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This order contains no substantive decision. It is an administrative listing directive granting the respondent bank further time to file a vakalat and calling for the same along with a counter submission on a future date.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 182/2023
in A.IR:444/2023
R.Dilip Kumar V/S Union Bank Of India
13/07/2023
None for Appellant.
Undertaking counsel for Respondent Bank Ms. Uma Maheshwari seeks further time to file Vakalath on behalf of Ld. Counsel S.R. Sundaram.
Appellant directed to provide copy of Documents including waiver petition to the Respondent counsel after filing Vakalath to enable filing counter.
Call on 03/08/2023 for vakalat and counter.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Dilip Kumar
- respondent
Union Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court