Central Bank of India and Anr. v. Shri Satish Kumar and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 356/2023 Date: 24.11.2023
Central Bank of India Vs. Shri Satish Kumar
Present: Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the appellant,
Shri Nand Kishor Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent no. 2 and submits that he has not been served with the copy of appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall serve the same upon the counsel for the respondent no. 2 during course of the day, who may file reply by the next date fixed.
The office report dated 23.11.2023 shows that the notice sent to the respondent no. 1 has returned back with endorsement “insufficient address”. Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 1 by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 08.01.2024 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Central Bank of India
- respondent
Satish Kumar
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090003562023
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court