G K Bhatnagar and others v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant filed a miscellaneous application under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against an interim order of a DRT, along with waiver and urgency applications. Counsel addressed defects in the appeal without deciding the merits.
What did the court decide?
Case listed before Chairperson for further orders on 22.03.2023.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 275/2023 Date: 17.03.2023
G.K. Bhatnagar and Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda
The present Misc. Application has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against interim order dated 21.02.2023 passed by DRT, Jabalpur in S.A. No. 231/2017. Waiver Application being (I.A. No. 208/2023), Urgency Application being (I.A. No. 209/2023) have also been filed.
Shri V.K. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present and removed the defects No. 2, 3 and 4, pointed out by the registry. With regard to affidavit the Ld. Counsel stated that since the affidavit has been notarized in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Rs. 10/- Non- judicial Stamp is not required as per the prevalent practice in that State
With regard to condition of pre-deposit the Ld. Counsel stated that Waiver Application (I.A. No. 208/2023) has been filed stating that since the impugned order dated 21.02.2023 is an interlocutory order passed by DRT, Jabalpur, in I.A. No. 199/2023 in S.A. No. 231/2017, as such the appellants are not liable to deposit any amount as provided under 2nd and 3rd proviso of Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 22.03.2023 for further orders.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.K. Bhatnagar and Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090002752023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court