Bank of India v. M/s. B.N Parida
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata directed the registry to issue notice to the respondent's counsel for the upcoming hearing in Dy. No. 294 of 2021, which was not sent after restoration.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 294 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.09.2023
The A.O. Cum Asst. General Manager Bank of India ... Appellants
-Vs-
B.N. Parida & Company and ors
Mr. Sounak Mukhopdyay, Learned Counsel, Ms. Atika Arif, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that after restoration no notice was sent to Learned Counsel for the Respondent. Registry is directed to send a notice to the Learned Counsel for the Respondents communicating the date of hearing.
List on 17th October, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of India
- respondent
B.N. Parida & Company
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090002942021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court