Bank of India v. M/s. B.N Parida
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a default dismissal order. No counsel appeared for the appellant, who had filed an appeal against a DRT decision. The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-appearance.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the appeal for default due to non-appearance of the appellant.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 294 of 2021
(Arising out of S.A. 84 of 2017 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 17.02.2023 | Bank of India | … Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| -Vs- | ||
| M/s. B.N. Parida | & Company & 4 | |
| Others | … Respondents |
None for Appellant
Mr. Kailash Chandra Satpathy, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears for Appellant. Though Learned Counsel for Respondents is present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 294 of 2021, stands dismissed in default.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of India
- respondent
M/s. B.N. Parida & Company
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court