Bank of Baroda v. M S Parvati Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court deemed service of notice sufficient via returned notices and listed the matter for reply.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 30/2023 Date: 25.04.2023
Present: Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant,
The office report dated 24.04.2023 shows that the notices sent to the respondent nos. 1 to 4 have returned back with endorsement “refused”. Therefore, the service of notice upon the respondent nos. 1 to 4 is deemed to have been sufficient.
Shri Utkarsh Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 5 and seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 09.08.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court