The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal by the appellant with liberty to approach the DRT with an appeal under Section 30 of the RDB Act, thereby disposing of the appeal as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the appeal allowed with liberty to approach the DRT with an appeal under Section 30 of the RDB Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 1582/2023
Between
Authum Investment & Infrastructure Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Daewoo Motors India Ltd. (In Liquidation) & …Respondent/s Ors.
Mr. Rishabh Shah along with Mr. Vivek Patil, i/b M/s. Vivek Patil & Associates, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Bhalchandra Palav, i/b M/s. Bhal & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 3 to 4
Mr. Rajesh Nagory, i/b Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Respondent (Auction Purchaser).
Ms. Barsha P., Advocate for Respondent No.1 (Official Liquidator)
-: Order dated: 20/09/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks to withdraw
the Appeal with liberty to approach the D.R.T. with an appeal u/s 30
of the RDB Act.
The Prayer is allowed and the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-31
1
Authum Investment & Infrastructure Ltd.
Daewoo Motors India Ltd. (In Liquidation)
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
