Arun Kumar Kar v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 367 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.07.2023
Mr. Arun Kumar Kar & Anr ... Appellants
-Vs-
The A.O. UCO Bank & ors
... Respondent
Mr. Siddhartha Banerjee, Learned Counsel, Ms. Arpita Saha, Learned Counsel Ms. Ankita Ghosh, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Ms. Sonal Agarwal, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant. There are certain serious allegations labelled against the Bank officers particularly authorized Officer in the supplementary affidavit filed on 12th May, 2023. Opportunity was given to the Respondent to file the counter affidavit. But no counter affidavit is filed. Today Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for time to file counter affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arun Kumar Kar & Anr
- respondent
The A.O. UCO Bank & ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090003672022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
21 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court