Amneesh Dand v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 116/2020 Date: 24.11.2022
Amneesh Dand Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjeev Singh, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Sanjeev Singh could not come from Lucknow, therefore he prays for adjournment.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list this case on 28.02.2023 for hearing. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amneesh Dand
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court