Alpa Nayan Vedant v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The NCLT/Mumbai departed from its decision to allow a debt recovery appeal and dismissed the petition, citing that the matter was tagged with other appeals for hearing on a future date.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed and the matter was posted for hearing on 11.10.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 875/2023
Between
Alpa Nayan Dedant V/s.
… Appellant/s
Canara Bank …Respondent/s
An Advocate for the Appellant is present.
Ms. Kadambari Patil, i/b Ms. Vaishali Bhilare, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 05/10/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
It is submitted that there are four other connected appeals coming up for hearing on 11.10.2023
This appeal shall also tagged along with those appeals for consideration.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alpa Nayan Dedant
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 271090008752023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court