Alpa Nayan Vedant v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRT disposed of five appeals filed by tenants challenging SARFAESI measures. The court held the appeals were unnecessary as the bank had ceased such measures. It noted the borrower liquidation under IBC and affirmed the appellants' right to challenge future notices under the Act.
What did the court decide?
N/A; Appeals disposed without adjudication on merits as they were deemed non-essential.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 275/2023
In
Appeal No. 26/2023
Between
Devendra Vedant … Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank …Respondent/s
AND
I.A. No. 272/2023
In
Appeal No. 23/2023
Between
Pradeep Vedant … Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank …Respondent/s
AND
I.A. No. 273/2023
In
Appeal No. 24/2023
Between
Darshan Bheda … Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank …Respondent/s
AND
I.A. No. 274/2023
In
Appeal No. 25/2023
Between
Parul Vedant … Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank …Respondent/s
AND
1
Appeal on Diary No. 875/2023
Between
Alpa Nayan Vedant … Appellant/s V/s.
Canara Bank …Respondent/s Mr. Deepan Dixit, along with Ms. Chinmayee Ghag, i/b M/s. Zastriya, Advocate for Appellants.
Ms Vaishali R. Bhilare, along with Ms. Kadambari Patil, Advocate for Respondents.
-:Common Order dated: 11/10/2023:-
These appeals are preferred by Applicants in different S.As. filed by them before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Mumbai (D.R.T) with the intention to protect their possession as alleged tenants over the properties proceeded by the Respondent Bank as a secured asset and steps under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act” for short) were initiated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alpa Nayan Vedant
- appellant
Devendra Vedant
- appellant
Pradeep Vedant
- appellant
Darshan Bheda
- appellant
Parul Vedant
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court