Yerram Venkata Ramana v. Karur Vysya Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal dismissed a waiver application for the appellant's absence due to want of prosecution. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
What did the court decide?
Waiver application dismissed; appeal dismissed as not maintainable.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 497of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 12 of 2019 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.11.2022 Yerram Venkata Ramana … Appellant -VsAuthorised Officer, Karur Vysya Bank Limited & 3 Others … Respondents
None for the Appellant
Ms. Sweta Ganghi with Ms. Pallavi Ganchi, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present on behalf of the Appellant. Hence the waiver application, being I.A. 336 of 2022, is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 497 of 2022, stands dismissed as not maintainable.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal admitability when the appellant did not appear and the waiver application was dismissed for want of prosecution was maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yerram Venkata Ramana
- respondent
Authorised Officer, Karur Vysya Bank Limited & 3 Others
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 191090004972022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court