Uco Bank v. M/s Beg Builder
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant filed an appeal under Section 20 of RDBB Act 1993. Tribunal noted defects including missing certified copy, incomplete fee particulars, and deficit fee, directing removal within 15 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.146/2018 ; Dt.:30.03.2022
UCO Bank ………...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Beg Builder.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 20 of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Samrat Mukherjee.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of UCO Bank against the order dt.27.04.2018 in OA/1346/2013 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.255/- vide T.R. no.112174 dt. 25.5.2018 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Samrat Mukherjee.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is well within the period of Limitation. Another Petition has been filed along with this for waiver of pre-deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
M/s. Beg Builder
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090001462018
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court