Sushmita Basu and Anr. v. United Commercial Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 30 of 2019) (Arising out of S.A. 310 of 2016 in DRT-2 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
22.03.2022 Nitay Basu & Another … Appellants Vs. United Bank of India & 3 Others … Respondents
None for the parties
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Diary No. 290 of 2019
The instant application, being Diary No. 290 of 2019, has been filed by the Appellant for condonation of delay, which is pending since long.
Today when the matter is taken up on second call, no one appears to press the application. Accordingly the application for condonation of delay, being Diary No. 290 of 2019, stands dismissed for default.
Consequently, the present appeal, being Diary No. 30 of 2019, also stands dismissed; being time barred.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nitay Basu & Another
- respondent
United Bank of India & 3 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court