The Tribunal allowed the appellant's prayer for time to amend the defective Memo of Appeal due to improper formatting and party names. The matter was listed for further proceedings.
Time allowed for amendment of the Memo of Appeal. Copy to be served upon Respondents after amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 48 of 2019) (Arising out of M.A. 12 of 2017 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
21.03.2022 Nivedita Ghosh … Appellant Vs. Uco Bank & 3 Others … Respondents Subhash Chandra Sarkar, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. S.N. Patra Bhatta, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3/UCO Bank
None for Respondent No. 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that the Memo of Appeal has not been filed in proper format, particularly, the names of the parties have not been arrayed properly; hence the appeal itself is defective.
Learned Counsel for Appellant prays for one week’s time to move proper application for amendment of the Memo of Appeal.
Prayer allowed. Appellant may take out amendment application and carry out necessary amendments. On completion of amendment, copy of the amended Memo of Appeal, both Volume I and Volume-II, be served upon the Respondent Bank.
List the matter on 13th April, 2022.
Sd/(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 21st March, 2022 10/ac
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal was filed in proper format with properly arrayed party names.
Nivedita Ghosh
Uco Bank & 3 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
