Sujit Ghosh v. Oriental Bank of Commerce
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar directed the appellant to remove defects in an application under Section 18 SARFAESI Act within 15 days, citing delay in limitation, missing annexures, deficit fees, and non-compliance with pre-deposit norms, else it would be rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.184/2019; Dt:29/03/2022
Sujit Ghosh.………...Appellant
Vs.
Oriental Bank of Commerce & anr……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Narayan Chandra Das.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Sujit Ghosh against the order dt.21.06.2019 in SA/134/2019 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-3, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.1505/- vide T.R. no.113652 dt. 26.07.2019 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Narayan Chandra Das.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation and not accompanied with any petition for condonation of delay.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 18 SARFAESI Act was within the period of limitation without a petition for condonation of delay.
Whether the application suffered from procedural defects such as missing annexures, deficit fees, and non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sujit Ghosh
- respondent
Oriental Bank of Commerce & anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court