Sri Bharath Kumar Jain v. Oriental Bank of Commerce
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Diary no.419/2019; Date : 22/04/2022
Sri Bharath Kumar Jain.………...Appellant
Vs.
Authorized Officer, Oriental Bank of Commerce & anr.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. M. Narasimha Rao.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Sri Bharath Kumar Jain against the order dt.21.01.2019 in SA/71/2018 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT, Visakhapatnam. Application fees of Rs.6,205/- vide T.R. no.114198 dt. 09.12.2019 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. M. Narasimha Rao.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not well within the period of Limitation but petition for condonation of delay is filed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bharath Kumar Jain
- respondent
Authorized Officer, Oriental Bank of Commerce & anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090004192019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sukhendu Kumar Narjary
- Order 2 · Sukhendu Kumar Narjary
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court