Smti Nalina T v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against Debts Recovery Tribunal order was found defective for missing certified account statement, insufficient pre-deposit, and delay. Matter remitted for issue of summons and filing of service affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Matter posted for filing affidavit of service of summons after noting defects.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY.No. /127/2022 Date: 05/05/2022
Smt. Nalina T. & Anr.. ...………...Appellants
Vs.
Canara Bank & Ors ...... .……….Respondents
Received an application under section 20 of the Recovery of Debts due to bank and financial institutions Act,1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Jibantaraj Dan Roy.
Scrutiny of the application observed the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Smt. Nalina T. & Anr against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-, Guwahati, order dated 15-07-2019 in OA/18/2019. Application fees of Rs.30505/- vide T.R. no.115627 dt.04-05-2022 has been paid along with the application.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with a petition for condonation of delay.
Waiver application is filed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Admissibility of appeal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debts due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 considering defects and limitation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Nalina T. & Anr
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 191090001272022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court