The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, declined to register a writ petition/apparatus since the appellant failed to attend after receiving opportunities to cure defects, presuming a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Diary No. 251/2022 declined for registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Diary No. 251/2022
Shri. Shrichand Sajandas Chawla 8% Anr. Appellants
V/s.
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.
Respondent
The Today's Board i.e. 15.09.2022 at 11.30 Hrs. for matters listed before the Registrar for removal of defects/ complianceis displayedinPublicNotice onthe website of DRT/DRAT andalso onNotice Boardof DRAT,Mumbai.
No representationforthe appellantwhenmatterwas called.
This Diary No. 251/2022 was lodged on 22/04/2022. Despite granting reasonable opportunities for removal of defects the appellant failed to remove the defects noticed by the office and remaining absent. Hence, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
In view of above & under the provision of sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 this Diary No. 251/2022 is hereby declined for registration.
a?2 Registrar, DRAT Mumbai
Date: 15.9.2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Shrichand Sajandas Chawla
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
