Bank of Maharashtra v. Shri Somnath Dadabhau Lipane and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal declined registration of two diaries as the appellant failed to remove defects within reasonable time and was absent during the hearing, presuming lack of interest.
What did the court decide?
Diaries No.382/2022 and 383/2022 are declined for registration.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery APpellate Tribunal, Mumbai
DiaryNo.382/2022 & Diary No. 383/2022
Bank of Maharashtra
.Appellant
V/s.
Shri. Somnath D Lipane & Ors.
Respondents
The Today's Board i.e. 15.09.2022 at 11.30 Hrs. for matters listed before the Registrar for removal of defects/ complianceis displayedinPublicNotice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on Notice Board of DRAT, Mumbai.
No representationfortheappellantwhenmatterwas called.
These DiaryNo.382/2022 Despite&D.No. granting383/2022 were reasonablelodged opportunities on 27/05/2022.forremoval of defectsthe appellant failedto removethedefectsnoticedbytheofficeandremaining absent. Hence,itispresumedthat,theappellantisnot interested inprosecuting the matter.
Inview of above&underthe provisionof sub Rule(4)of Rule6DRAT(Procedure)Rules,1994theseDiaryNo. 382/2022andDiaryNo.383/2022areherebydeclined for registration.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Maharashtra
- respondent
Shri. Somnath D Lipane & Ors.
Coram
Shri. B. S. Nampoothiri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 271090003822022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sri. P.w.gorakh
- Order 2 — this page · Sri. P.w.gorakh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court