Shri Premkumar Devandas Kishnani v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal and application for waiver of deposit dismissed as infructuous following the prior dismissal of the underlying appeal regarding status quo extension.
What did the court decide?
N/A
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 541/2022 (WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 1105/2022
Between
Shri Premkumar Devandas Kishnani
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Gaurang Kinkhabwala along with Mr Herbert Naronha, i/b Mr Meghnath Navlani, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr Rishabh Shah, i/b Ms Vaishali Bhilare, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 Bank.
Mr Rajesh Dubey, i/b Ms Shradha Aggarwal, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal and application for waiver of deposit should be dismissed as infructuous given the prior dismissal of the underlying appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Premkumar Devandas Kishnani
- respondent
Canara Bank
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090011052022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 — this page · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court