Sekhar Mahajan and Anr. v. I C I C I Bank Limited
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 39/2021 In Appeal Dy. No. 125/2019 Date: 15.07.2022
Sekhar Mahajan & Anr. Vs. ICICI Bank Ltd.
Present: Shri Alok Rai, Advocate holding brief of Shri Jagdamba Singh, counsel for the appellants,
The record shows that affidavit of service has been filed without tracking report, therefore, it cannot be ascertained that whether the respondents have been noticed or not. Hence, the learned counsel for the appellant is directed to file tracking report to authenticate the service of notice upon the respondents by the next date.
List this case on 31.08.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sekhar Mahajan
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090001252019
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court