M Satish Kumar v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In an appeal before the DRT-Appeals Tribunal at Kolkata, the matter was adjourned to 01.11.2022 for filing an affidavit of service, as no representation appeared for the respondents.
What did the court decide?
Time granted for filing affidavit of service by the next court date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY No./31/2020, Date. 20/09/2022
M Satish Kumar & Anr. ……… Appellants
V/s.
Canara Bank & Ors.…………. Respondents
Ld. Counsel Mr. Nemani Srinivas appears on behalf of appellants and prays for time to file affidavit of service by next date.
None appears for respondents.
The matter is posted on 01.11.2022 for filing of affidavit of service.
REGISTRAR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time for filing affidavit of service was granted or not.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M Satish Kumar & Anr.
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090000312020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court