M Satish Kumar v. Canara Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY No./31/2020, Date. 01/11/2022
M Satish Kumar ……… Appellant
V/s.
Canara Bank …………. Respondents
None appears for Appellant.
Ld. Counsel Mr. Archan Dutta along with Ld. Counsel Mr. Subhadip Basu is present on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and files vakalatnama. Ld. Counsel for Respondent submits that only copy of summon has been received but memo of appeal has not been received.
Ld. Counsel for Appellant is directed to serve memo of appeal to all the Respondents by next date.
Post the matter on 17/11/2022 for affidavit of service.
REGISTRAR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M Satish Kumar
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court