Samaresh Dhar v. Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal Dy No. 238 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 323 of 2019 in DRT-1 Kolkata )
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.12.2022
Samaresh Dhar
… Appellant
-Vs-
Bank of India & Anr.
… Respondent Mr. Rudra Dhar, ld. counsel for the appellant.
Mr. D. Chakraborty, learned counsel with Ms. S. Pal, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant could not reply to the queries during the course of argument despite time granted to show that the property in dispute is not a secured asset. It appears that learned counsel for the appellant is not prepared with the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samaresh Dhar
- respondent
Bank of India & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090002382020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court