Union Bank of India v. Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court received IA applications; recorded service status; directed filing of affidavit for substituted service regarding absent respondents; remanded filing of vakalath by counsel.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 435, IA 436 & IA 437/2022 In R.A:97/2019
Union Bank Of India V/S Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd & Ors
29/11/2022
Appellant counsel present. Files POS for IAs 435,436 & 437/2022 (impleading).
R3,R4, & R5 returned as no such addressee.
R9,R10,R11,R12 served.
R1 present.
R. Venkatesulu undertakes to file Vakalath in respect of R10,R11 and R12 (Legal Heir ).
R7 Party in person present.
None for R9.
Appellant counsel instructed to file Affidavit for substituted service in respect of R3 to R5.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Bank Of India
- respondent
Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court