M Murugesan v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Registry order declining the appeal in terms of Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994 due to non-compliance of Office Objections within the stipulated time.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined for non-compliance of Office Objections.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:290/2022
M.Murugesan V/S A.O.,Indian Bank & Anr
28/11/2022
None for Appellant.
Office Objections have not been complied yet despite considerable time given on 03/11/2022,17/11/2022 and today.
Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994 as Office Objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed or declined due to non-compliance of Office Objections.
What is the effect of non-compliance of Office Objections under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.Murugesan
- respondent
A.O., Indian Bank & Anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090002902022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court