De让它 Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourned hearing in an appeal due to lack of Vakalatnama, directing the appellant and Respondent No.7 to engage counsel and file Vakalatnama by the next date.
Appellants and Respondent No.7 directed to engage lawyers and file Vakalatnama by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 97/2013
Between Bank of India & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Mr. Mahesh s/o Shrikant Joshi & Ors. …Respondent/s -: Order dated : 04/04/2022 :-
Ms. Uma S. Fadia, learned counsel appearing for Appellant submits that she has no instructions from the Bank and seeks permission to withdraw her Vakalatnama, therefore, she is not able to make any submissions.
Ms. Pallavi Chari, i/b Mr. O. A. Das, Advocate, submits that she proposes to represent Appellant in place of earlier Advocate and seeks time to file her Vakalatnama.
Ms. Sumedha Sawant, i/b M/s. N. N. Amin & Co., Advocate, submitted that she is representing Respondent No.7 and seeks time to file her Vakalatnama.
Appellant and Respondent No.7 are directed to engage lawyer and to file Vakalatnama on or before the next date and get ready for hearing on the next date.
Post on 23.06.2022 for hearing.
dpj/mks-19
1
Bank of India
Bank of India & Anr.
Mr. Mahesh s/o Shrikant Joshi
Mr. Mahesh s/o Shrikant Joshi & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
