A listing order directing the appellant to engage a lawyer and file Vakalatnama after the notice counsel reported lack of instructions. The matter was post-listed.
Appellant directed to engage lawyer and file Vakalatnama.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 94/2013
Between Bank of India & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Mr. Rajendra s/o Parshuram Gainkar & Ors. …Respondent/s -: Order dated : 04/04/2022 :-
Ms. Uma S. Fadia, learned counsel appearing for Appellant No.1 submits that she has no instructions from the Bank and seeks permission to withdraw her Vakalatnama, therefore, she is not able to make any submissions.
Ms. Pallavi Chari, i/b Mr. O. A. Das, Advocate, submits that she proposes to represent Appellant in place of earlier Advocate and seeks time to file her Vakalatnama.
Appellant is directed to engage lawyer and to file Vakalatnama on or before the next date and get ready for hearing on the next date.
There is no appearance for Respondents.
Post on 23.06.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-16
1
Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Rajendra s/o Parshuram Gainkar & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
