The Tribunal allowed an intra-court application seeking the substitution of Syndicate Bank's name with Canara Bank in the pending appeal due to the amalgamation of the bankers.
Application allowed; name of Canara Bank substituted in place of Syndicate Bank in the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 95/2019 Arising out of O.A. No. 334/2011 (DRT-III, Delhi)
HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs Syndicate Bank & Ors.
25.03.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Romila Joshi, Ld. Counsel for appellant
Mr. S.V. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
I.A. No.55/2022
This is an application seeking change in the name of respondent no.1 from Syndicate Bank to Canara Bank due to amalgamation of both the banks.
Heard. Application is allowed. Let the name of Canara Bank be substituted in place of Syndicate Bank.
I.A. No.216/2019 (Application for delay condonation)
List for hearing on 28.07.2022.
Reply stands filed. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Syndicate Bank
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
