Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank) v. Smt Neelam Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjourned to allow appellant bank counsel to file a reply in time for final arguments. No disposal on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 145/2020 Arising out of S.A. No. 25/2020 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank) Vs Smt. Suman Sharma
&
Misc. Appeal No. 144/2020 Arising out of S.A. No. 26/2020 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank) Vs Smt. Neelam Rani
24.03.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents except respondent no.1 in both the cases
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant bank. The learned counsel for respondents states that a connected case has been listed on 10.05.2022 and he may be given time to file reply. Let reply be filed within three weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within three weeks thereafter.
List the matter for final arguments on 10.05.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
Smt. Suman Sharma
Smt. Neelam Rani
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court