The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal stayed proceedings on two appeals after the respondent counsel accepted notice. The court directed the supply of appeal documents to the counsel and fixed a two-week deadline for filing the reply. The auction purchaser indicated no immediate insistence on refund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 92/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 202/2022 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Punjab & Sind Bank Vs M/s Raghav Filling Station & Ors.
AND
Appeal No. 93/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 202/2022 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Vineet Malik & Ors. Vs Punjab & Sind Bank
15.07.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: Ms. Seema Gutpta, Ld. counsel for appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar, Ld. counsel for respondent no. 1 to 5.
Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for Auction Purchaser.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. counsel for the respondents have appeared and they accept notice of the appeal. Ld. counsel for respondent no. 1 to 5 states that copy of appeal and documents have not been supply to him. Let the same be supply to him. Let the reply be file within two weeks.
List the matter on 18.08.2022. Till then, the Ld. counsel for the auction purchaser states that he will not insist for the refund of money.
(CHAIRPERSON)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether reply to the appeals will be filed within two weeks after receipt of documents.
Punjab & Sind Bank
M/s Raghav Filling Station & Ors.
Vineet Malik & Ors.
Punjab & Sind Bank
Auction Purchaser
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
