Dilip Agarwal v. State Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order recorded the opposition filed by the respondent bank, noted the appellant's submission regarding the death of Respondent No. 4, and directed steps for substitution within three weeks. The matter was listed for future hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 93 of 2017) (Arising out of S.A. 676 of 2013 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.08.2022 Dilip Agarwal … Appellant -VsThe Authorised Officer, State Bank of Hyderabad & 4 Others … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank; taken on record.
Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that Respondent No. 4 died.
Steps for substitution be taken within three weeks with notices to the proposed LRs; who may file objections within three weeks thereafter with advance copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of listing.
List on 9th November, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dilip Agarwal
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of Hyderabad & 4 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court