Disposed
Smt Lalitha Gupta v. Punjab and Sind Bank
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/242/2018
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 242 of 2018) (Arising out of S.A. 17 of 2011 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
03.08.2022
Smt. Lalitha Gupta … Appellant
-Vs-
Punjab & Sind Bank … Respondent
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Ms. Jayati Chowdhury with Ms. Ranjana Seal, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Respondent Bank; taken on record. Learned Counsel for Respondent submits that the cost, as per order dated 11th July, 2022, shall be deposited in course of the day.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks.
List on to 7th November, 2022 for hearing of the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 3rd August, 2022 14/ac
Smt. Lalitha Gupta
Punjab & Sind Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court