Sayyad Nazmul Hasan v. Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 51/2020 In Regular Appeal No. 93/2014 Date: 26.09.2022
Sayyad Nazmul Hasan & Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Present: Shri Shresth Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellants, Shri Asharfi Lal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vipul Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 2,
The office report dated 23.09.2022 shows that no steps have been taken by the counsel for the appellant for service of notice upon the respondent-bank pursuant to the earlier order dated 14.07.2022. Let fresh steps be taken within a week as per order dated 14.07.2022 of this Tribunal. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 19.12.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sayyad Nazmul Hasan & Anr.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court