Canara Bank & Anr. v. Rohit Khanna & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an order dated 26.04.2022 in Appeal No. 88/2017, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, directed the Appellant Bank to ensure service of notice on Respondents within four weeks, warning of dismissal for non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Appellant Bank to serve notice on Respondents within four weeks; failure to comply will lead to dismissal.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 88/2017
Between
Canara Bank & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Rohit Khanna & Anr. …Respondent/s
-: Order dated : 26/04/2022 :-
There is no representation for Appellant Bank.
It is seen that Respondents have not been served despite being granted several adjournments to serve notice on them.
The Appellant Bank is directed to take steps on the Respondents, without fail, within a period of four weeks, or else face dismissal of the Appeal.
Post on 13.07.2022 for steps / dismissal.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-36
1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Appeal should be dismissed due to non-service of notice on Respondents in the absence of representation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank & Anr.
- respondent
Rohit Khanna & Anr.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court