Appeal by Punjab and Sind Bank where respondents were absent; reply cure required, so appeal post-poned for ex-parte hearing dated 16.11.2022. Court disposed of nothing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 87/2019
Between
Punjab and Sind Bank … Appellant/s V/s.
M/s Nova Tours and Travels & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Rajesh Nagori along with Mrs D.B. Raghani, i/b M/s. Haridas & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.
-: Order dated: 26/09/2022:-
The Respondents have been served and the Respondents Nos. 1 to 6 appeared through counsel.
There is no representation for the Respondents today.
Although, Respondents Nos 1 to 5 have filed a reply which is lying under some objections raised by the Registry which has to be cured.
No reply has been filed by Respondent No. 6.
There is no representation for the Respondents today and therefore, they are called absent and set ex-parte.
Post on 16.11.2022 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-27
1
Punjab and Sind Bank
M/s Nova Tours and Travels & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
