Ms Sangita Maity v. Shaila Motors and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata received an application under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, noted procedural details, accepted the application was within limitation, and posted it for service of summons with no substantive decision rendered.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.644/2021; Dt:23/03/2022
Mrs. Sangita Maity.………...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Shaila Motors Pvt. Ltd. & ors..……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Santosh Kumar Ray.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Mrs. Sangita Maity against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.45000/- vide T.R. no.115400 dt. 15.12.2021 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Santosh Kumar Ray.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is well within the period of Limitation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Sangita Maity
- respondent
M/s. Shaila Motors Pvt. Ltd. & ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court